Whether
or not you believe the liberal hype that Republicans are unwilling to work with
the President because he’s black, the fact remains that there policy of ‘no’ is
perhaps one of the most brilliant political strategies of our time, and probably
reflects not some deep seeded racism, but an uncompromising, no holds bar,
determination to win in 2012. So powerful is the motivation to engage in a
policy of ‘no’, that Republicans are willing to stake the entire financial and
social future of our country on it; in fact the failure of congress and the
blockading of anything remotely beneficial to our stagnating economy is the key
part of the strategy.
Exactly
when this strategy was conceived is hard to pin down, but most likely it came
into being precisely when congress first met after Obama’s inauguration. John
Boehner certainly came out kicking when he first suggested that the Republicans
were going to refuse to work with Democrats on anything during the 4 years of the
Obama Presidency. This attitude quickly coalesced into a mantra that
Republicans began chanting as Obama worked to enact the central policies of his
administration. Obama naively imagined he could bridge the political divide and
create bipartisanship in a house divided, but this dream was quickly co-opted
by Republicans who realized that a policy of non-compromise would force Obama
to fail at his own game. Republicans said no. Republicans knew that if they
were to give even an inch to the opposition, they would be perceived as
collaborators in the Obama administration when they came up for re-election 2
or 4 years down the line.
There
strategy was as simple as the old anti-drug campaign of the 80’s: “Just Say
No.” The plan worked like this; allow Obama to announce sweeping changes and
stir up support, then quickly come out and refuse to support the president,
vote no on any legislation put forward by the democrats, and then wait. After
the Republican sweep in 2010, their policy gained teeth in the form of a
majority in the house, which enabled them to not only stand on the sidelines
and vote no, but actually defeat and prevent any meaningful legislation from
being passed. Looking at the record of congress over the past two years, this
is exactly what they did, as this has been the worst congress on record for
both bipartisan support and passing legislation. No wonder it’s facing a 6%
approval rating. But the Republicans don’t care about that, they’re not worried
about the perceptions of congress or whether or not the legislation put forward
would actually help, there vision stay fixed on the Presidential race of 2012.
By hijacking congress for two years and blocking nearly everything the
President has put forward, they have finally put in place the final part of
their plan, and it happens to be the most important feature: turn the tables
and use all of Obama’s failures that they engineered over the past congress
against him.
Suddenly,
the fact that Obama couldn’t pass any legislation in the past two years is his
fault. Obama’s failed bipartisanship is due to his unwillingness to compromise,
when he is perhaps the most devoted conciliator of all time. All of the partisan bickering over the past 2
years is all on him, regardless of the fact that Republicans were the one’s
saying no. In 2011 the stalemate was so bad that they very nearly brought our
country to financial ruin by there unwillingness to work with democrats on the
debt ceiling debate. It was the Republican blockading that ultimately led to America ’s
credit rating being downgrade. Moody’s directly cited the Republicans as the reason
for the move. Yet, again they managed to hoodwink the public into thinking that
it was Obama and his ‘sublimated anger’ that prevented any compromise, and
people believe them. In reality, Obama was so willing to compromise over this
issue that he even put social security on the table for cuts, something unheard
of for a democratic President. The reason he did that is because Obama really
is a conciliator; he has always tried to work with the other side throughout
his political career and truly believes that bipartisanship is a virtue. His
naivety was his downfall however, and it took the truly monumental debt ceiling
crisis for him to finally realize that no matter what he said or did, the other
side was never going to cross the aisle. If they allowed Obama any success it
would have been the demise of their overall goal; to create a failed Presidency
and a failed economy.
This
is the hallmark of the Republican strategy, and from a political point of view,
it is brilliant; engineer a failed presidency by blocking any and everything
that comes to a vote, and then turn around and blame the other side. Now
Republicans can say things like, “He’s a failed leader,” “He has no vision for America ,” etc,
because he can’t get anything done. It’s reminiscent of a gangster “protection”
racket; ‘see how badly your business is doing because you don’t have us
protecting you?’ When ultimately it’s the gangsters themselves who are
sabotaging the business in order to justify the protection money. It’s now a
fait accompli, the shit has hit the fan because of the republican opposition
and now they want to be the ‘good guys’ that will go in and clean up the house
they destroyed. It’s pretty amazing that people have been so easily duped by
this strategy, but then again it worked well for the mob for years. The
Republicans are banking on the infinitesimally short attention span of
Americans when it comes to politics. They know that people will blame the
President for anything that went wrong over the past 4 years, regardless of
their actions in congress. In our fast paced internet age, with 24 hour news
cycles, they are betting that people will just accept anything that they say
now and forget that they were the one’s who got us into this mess.
Republicans
may be successful with the strategy, but unfortunately the loser is not just
Obama and the democrats, but all Americans. The legislation that they have
blocked and refused to comprise on, could have had a real and profound impact
on American’s lives. The jobs bill for instance, would have gone a long way at
helping to reverse the unemployment trend in this country. Republicans said no.
If they let the unemployment rate drop below 8%, Obama may win the election.
This may sound harsh, but that is exactly what the Republicans were worried
about. They knew that the economy would again be the central theme of the 2012
election cycle, and therefore they couldn’t concede anything they may help it.
Republicans may deny this till their blue in the face, and claim any number of
invented excuses for not voting for legislation that would have helped the
economy, but really there is no other explanation for their unwillingness to
work together than that they were helping to stifle the economy so they could
blame Obama. Preventing economic recovery under Obama was their central guiding
platform over the last 4 years, with the understanding that if he failed at
creating jobs he would certainly lose the election.
This
is what politics is America
has become: it’s not about using your power as a representative to help the
people, it’s about helping the party. If that means preventing economic growth,
nearly bankrupting our nation, and forcing the downgrade of our credit rating,
well that’s just the price that’s paid in today’s election cycle. If this is an
indication of things to come for our country, then we really are at the edge of
a precipice, and if we fall in, our county will end up mired in partisan
bickering and unable to even run the government. If the democrats take up the
same tack if Obama loses the election, then we are in for another 4 years of
nothing. Yet, historically at least the democrats have shown that they can and
will cross the aisle, and don’t think of ‘compromise’ as a dirty word. During
the Bush term, they facilitated many of his most conservative policies and many
voted for both wars. Granted, it was after 9/11 and a feeling of patriotism
swept through our country after this crisis, but what about the crisis of the
Great Recession? Surely during a generational calamity such as the near
collapse of our economy, our leaders could come together and tackle our
problems? The Republicans said no. Their desire to retake the white house
proved stronger than their patriotism. In a party of such self-avowed American
lovers, it’s shocking that they would complicitly take part in the demise of
our country. Regardless of your views of politics, surely the most important
thing is that our country get back on it’s feet, lest we cease to be “the
greatest country in the world.” Yet, that is precisely why they’ve engineered
the failure; now it’s Obama’s fault, he
wants to take down America
a notch, he doesn’t believe in the
American Dream, he’s an apologist.
All false of course, but by letting the country’s world wide prestige drop
down, they can then point at Obama and blame him and then claim he’s
philosophically opposed to America being the greatest nation. That’s the icing
on the cake for Republicans; not only can they point at his failed policy, but
they can then claim that his failure is due to some apologetic philosophy that
Obama has towards America, that somehow he’s really a socialist Europe-lover
who wants nothing more than America to be a subordinate in the world’s stage.
As
political strategies go, the policy of ‘no’ would make Karl Rove proud, but is
it worth it? After all is said and done, is this the way we want American
politics to go? Is winning elections so important that our leaders are willing
to let the country fail in order for them to win? Only the coming weeks will
answer these questions, as it’s up to Americans now to decide who really has
the country’s best interests in mind. If the hoodwinking works, and American
chooses the Republicans, we will be in for many more years of oppositional
politics because strategists will see that it worked and use it again and
again.
Links:
Republicans vs Straw Men
New Gop Plan same as old Gop Plan
Paul Ryan admits Marathon Lie
http://www.salon.com/2012/09/01/republicans_vs_straw_men/
http://www.salon.com/2012/09/02/new_gop_plan_same_as_old_gop_plan/
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/09/01/paul-ryan-marathon-time_n_1848715.html?utm_hp_ref=mostpopular
Links:
Republicans vs Straw Men
New Gop Plan same as old Gop Plan
Paul Ryan admits Marathon Lie
http://www.salon.com/2012/09/01/republicans_vs_straw_men/
http://www.salon.com/2012/09/02/new_gop_plan_same_as_old_gop_plan/
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/09/01/paul-ryan-marathon-time_n_1848715.html?utm_hp_ref=mostpopular
No comments:
Post a Comment